3 min readAnna — MarginiaEN

Why doing nothing is sometimes the safest ecommerce decision

In ecommerce, the pressure to act is constant.

New tools, new strategies, and new “best practices” appear all the time — each promising better results.

In that environment, not changing anything can easily feel like a mistake.

If something isn’t growing, surely it needs to be “fixed”.

In practice, however, many sellers lose money not because they did too little — but because they changed something too early.

Why change often feels like the right response

From a business owner’s perspective, the situation often looks like this:

  • sales exist, but growth is slower than expected,
  • advertising costs increase,
  • a sense of stagnation appears,
  • someone suggests “optimization”.

At that moment, making a change creates a feeling of control.

Something is happening. Something is being done.

The problem is that action itself does not reduce risk.

Change can increase risk — even when it looks rational

In ecommerce, many elements are tightly connected:

  • pricing,
  • margins,
  • traffic sources,
  • customer behavior,
  • seasonality.

Changing one element often affects several others — sometimes in ways that are hard to predict.

For example:

  • a new campaign structure can change traffic quality,
  • a pricing adjustment can lower conversion rates,
  • a new landing page can extend the buying journey.

Each change may make sense in isolation,

but together they can create outcomes that are difficult to evaluate.

When doing nothing is a rational choice

Doing nothing does not mean being passive.

Often, it is a deliberate decision to protect what already works.

Most commonly when:

  • the business is profitable,
  • there is no clear data pointing to the root of a problem,
  • performance fluctuates but is not alarming,
  • decisions are based on incomplete information.

In such situations, rapid change often increases uncertainty rather than reducing it.

Three signals it’s worth pausing before making changes

Before introducing modifications, it’s worth paying attention to a few warning signs.

1. You can’t clearly define the problem

If the problem sounds like:

  • “something isn’t working”,
  • “results could be better”,
  • “others seem to be doing better”,

then the diagnosis likely does not exist yet.

Change without diagnosis is an experiment with an unknown cost.

2. Pressure comes mainly from outside

The impulse to change often comes from:

  • agencies,
  • tool providers,
  • market trends.

That doesn’t mean these inputs are wrong.

But they are not always aligned with the reality of a specific business.

3. There is no clear reference point

If you don’t know:

  • what results are acceptable,
  • over what timeframe changes should be evaluated,
  • what would count as improvement,

then any change will be hard to assess — regardless of the outcome.

Doing nothing as a decision, not an excuse

Sometimes the safest first step is not action,

but understanding the current situation.

Without taking over operational control.

Without promises of quick wins.

Without pressure to decide immediately.

In many cases, this clarity reveals that:

  • change is not needed right now,
  • the risk outweighs the potential upside,
  • a different stage of the business will be a better moment.

Ecommerce decisions are rarely black and white

Many problems don’t have a single obvious solution.

Often the question is not what to change,

but when — and why.

That’s why doing nothing can be not only reasonable,

but sometimes the most responsible decision available.

If a second opinion would be useful before making changes — this is the type of work Marginia does.